Teaching
by Littlebit on This and That
The wonderful thing about learning theories and recipes is
that at a certain point after you have drunk 27,000 cups of coffee,
your Innate Creativity kicks in and what happens is that you begin
to disassemble the parts of the theories and recipes and reassemble
them into your own style of homemade ice-cream-and-bacon casserole.
I think in scientific and New Age circles they call this particular
phenomenon "insight."
I had a recent insight about my profession, which is a large
car resembling major world religions, such as the Ferrari, to
which you profess undying devotion. I am a teacher of wriggling
masses of Middle Age students who bring me bribes of Oreos so
they can hand in their essays a couple of minutes late. By fax.
If they are absent. Or, if they are bodily in school, then technically
they may shuffle and staple their essays the first 90 seconds
of class and hand it in. Actually, I had several insights involving
my profession, one of which was to trade it in for an actual cream
and black Honda because the insurance for a Ferrari ran into the
range of six times my annual gross income.
Last year apart from spending very little time washing and
waxing my Honda, unlike my neighbors who spend an extraordinary
amount of their early evenings after work washing, waxing, and
hands-akimbo-appraising the former activities' results, I earned
a couple of pieces of paper which tell the world that I am a Person
Knowledgeable about Teaching. Yes, Now I Am Really, Truly a Teacher,
Agent Scully, and I have The Files to prove it. Although, just
between you and me, what I learned about teaching is a bunch of
methods, theories and recipes which I recognize do not mean anything
until I apply my own meaning to them. Which is the reason why
I spent this last summer horizontal on a lawn chair meditating
on teaching and chugging Long Island Iced Teas. Here are my insights.
And I warn you, I have been teaching for a little over half a
decade (doesn't that sound impressive? it's called "choice
of words," which is a writing trick lawyers think only they
know how to use), plus I have Pieces of Paper Saying I Am A Teacher,
so there.
Insight Number One deals with Methodology, which as we all
know is best understood by sitting in a traffic jam in Bangkok
and spending the long boring minutes picking your nose. A lot
of the Teaching Methods in the monographs, which is a book written
by a person who didn't learn how to share drool-soaked cookies
in kindergarten, call for something called social learning. (They
are so shrill. They beat Mariah Carey; you should hear them shrilly
calling, "Social Learning! Social Learning!")
Social learning is when you somehow manage to herd children
into small groups and bribe them with chocolate bars to "learn
together." This latter phrase is a mysterious event which
is rumored to happen within the dynamics of small herds of children.
The insight I gained from this idea of social learning is: Don't
Do It Unless you Are An Alien With a 360-degree Visual Range.
You see, the example in the monograph by Seymour Butts, Ph.D.,
concerns children from the mandatory-naptime-and-gosh-dinosaurs-are-swell
age to the my-partner-is-a-girl-EEUUWW age. Dr. Butts might think
these children can roll around on the reading rug and talk about
character and motivation in Jurassic Park (I am big. I want to
eat you.), and everything is fine, they are learning in a social
context. But hey, I teach Middle Age kids. They have long since
shed their mail and armor and stopped jousting in soccer fields,
but THINK about it. Remember the Middle Ages? Here's my candid,
professional insight regarding social learning on the reading
rug for Middle Age children: if you Just Do It, the suckers are
going to breed.
Insights like this do not happen quite often in the summer,
when most thoughts take long, all-expenses-paid vacations in Tahiti
and leave you with inexplicable urges to reach for books by Robert
Ludlum (shiver) and the latest lawyer novel (In the event of gastric
discomfort, there is an airsick bag located in the seat pocket
in front of you.) Insights like these happen mostly in the fall,
or early winter, or at any time in the ten months you are teaching
school, and you have just ended a class saying, "In your
journal, write 150 to 200 words comparing the views of people
who like Leonardo DiCrapio in "Romeo and Juliet" and
the views of Shirley Jackson in "The Lottery"
due
tomorrow." and, after a minute of silence while the young
brains of our future absorb the information, you hear their full,
Whitmanesque-ishly modulated voices break into meaningful sounds:
"Do we have to write it in our journal?"
"Paper? Is it on paper?"
Eureka.